Critical Analysis of Research Papers Examples

Critical Analysis of Research Papers ExamplesMost readers know the concept of critical analysis of research papers, but very few know the practical application of this. First of all, we define what is meant by critical analysis of research papers. It means that the writer of the paper will study each and every aspect of the research report and will find out the flaws in the logic of the conclusion.A lot of times, the conclusion seems to be logical and easy to understand, but it is actually deceptive. The paper should be analyzed thoroughly, so that the reader can see that it is not believable. Now let us look at a few examples where this is possible.Take a scientific theory for example. I am not going to talk about your favourite hypothesis in biology. You know it. I am sure that you have learned this particular information in the classroom. When did you learn this?To some of you, you probably learnt this information in science class. To others, you probably learnt it on your Physics or Chemistry textbook. But most of you probably learned it on a test paper. This is when the critical analysis of research papers takes place.The writer of the paper is going to look for flaws in the reasoning and conclusions contained in the paper. This is a vital part of the analysis because the writer has the tools available to him or her to confirm that the conclusion is not supported by the evidence.If you examine a commentary on a study or a review of a book, you will probably find out that the author used several different types of writing styles to express his or her opinion on the paper, while in the same way, a discussion paper is written as a single essay. Therefore, the critic is going to find that the writer did not really look at the arguments put forward by the author of the paper.In conclusion, it can be said that a critical analysis of research papers is done systematically. The points that will be taken into consideration by the critic are:The author's goals, the methods used to reach those goals, the results achieved, the methods used, the results obtained, the reasons for failure to reach the goal, and the results of these methods. The critic will also consider the author's background, training, and education in related disciplines. These are considered to be the 3 primary elements of the argument. If an author claims that his results are supported by general knowledge, this is not going to get enough attention from the critic.